Wikipedia:Editor review/McDoobAU93

McDoobAU93
I've been a part of Wikipedia since October 2006. I've learned a lot while reading and editing, and I truly enjoy making the project a more informative and reliable source for information. I also try and welcome new users, hoping they get as much out of Wikipedia as I do. McDoobAU93 (talk) 21:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * You appear to have a healthy amount of content work to go with your vandalism patrolling. I think it's good that you have chosen articles on topics that you are interested in and have consistently worked to maintain them.  Also, after a read-through of your talkpage, you seem to do a good job with dealing with conflicts and answering questions calmly and thoroughly.  Keep up the good work!  I'll see you around.  -- Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 07:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I've made over 2200 edits to Wikipedia so far. Maybe not the most prolific editor, but I do try and make a difference. Unfortunately, I spend more time than I like fixing vandalism and test edits, but I try and treat each appropriately (i.e., I don't bite). I work in a lot of theme park and amusement ride articles, removing rumors and speculation (something commonly added) while adding facts, and sources to back them up. I also am trying to de-list articles, so to speak; I mean, converting lists of information into prose, which is more encyclopedic. One of my more recent accomplishments was converting the numerous lists in Disney's Hollywood Studios to a better form. I've started work on Disney's Animal Kingdom to accomplish the same goal.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * When working with other people, conflict happens. When asked a question about my edits, I try and answer with my point of view and listen to theirs. In almost every case, we reach some consensus, which makes the article that much better. I have to admit I've gotten involved in a couple of edit wars, but during them, I've learned how to better handle the situation, and when to get Wikipedia itself involved, through the admins and various noticeboards.
 * When working with other people, conflict happens. When asked a question about my edits, I try and answer with my point of view and listen to theirs. In almost every case, we reach some consensus, which makes the article that much better. I have to admit I've gotten involved in a couple of edit wars, but during them, I've learned how to better handle the situation, and when to get Wikipedia itself involved, through the admins and various noticeboards.