Wikipedia:Editor review/Mikedk9109

User:Mikedk9109
I would like to be reviewed because I have been an editor for 9 months, and have accumulated over 6,500 edits. I want to know what other editors think of me and my contributions.  Mikedk9109  (hit me up)  23:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Mike, you're a great editor. You've provided so many free use images to wrestling articles that it is almost unbelievable. Your editing skills have helped many wrestling articles, and your contributions are appreciated by everyone. --  T H  L  01:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)


 * For some constructive criticism, you need to use edit summaries more often. Mathbot gives your percentage as 29% for major edits, and only 7% for minor edits. --  T H  L  02:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I am particulary proud of the expanding on baseball articles I do. Also, alot of work on wrestling articles that I have done.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, I've been in a few. One with Tonetare about information to be included on an article. Another with CyberGhostface on information to be included in an article, and one with a few other editors where editors took sides on what to include in a template. I dealt with the Tonetare conflict by leaving because it caused me so much stress, but when I came back, we apologized to each other. I dealt with the CyberGhostface conflict by realizing it was a stupid conflict and we both apologized. The template war was ended when all the users (including myself) were blocked for 3RR violations, and we made a survey on what to be included. I haven't been in a real conflict since then and hope not to be in one again. I will deal with future conflicts by listening to others opinions (not just myself and the opposing editor's) on what they think is right.
 * Yes, I've been in a few. One with Tonetare about information to be included on an article. Another with CyberGhostface on information to be included in an article, and one with a few other editors where editors took sides on what to include in a template. I dealt with the Tonetare conflict by leaving because it caused me so much stress, but when I came back, we apologized to each other. I dealt with the CyberGhostface conflict by realizing it was a stupid conflict and we both apologized. The template war was ended when all the users (including myself) were blocked for 3RR violations, and we made a survey on what to be included. I haven't been in a real conflict since then and hope not to be in one again. I will deal with future conflicts by listening to others opinions (not just myself and the opposing editor's) on what they think is right.