Wikipedia:Editor review/Mm40

Mm40
I've been on Wikipedia for a few months. I hope to one day become an admin. Your comments here will be greatly appreciated. I know that this is in the wrong place. Me  what do u want?  Your Hancock Please  11:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * First, I need to say that I have finally found a Wikipedian younger by myself. And now I am mad at you for stealing my treasured "youngest Wikipedian" award (just kidding, I probably lost that 2 or 3 years ago). To get to business, you don't have enough mainspace or Talk edits. While you do have many User talk edits, which is normally a good thing, they don't seem to be focused on content, but rather connected with your abnormally large number of User edits. Something good is your number of project space edits, but they seem to be often connected with formatting problems. Oh, and edit summaries are a necessity for the smart editor.

In a nutshell:
 * 1) Talk about content.
 * 2) Use the "Show preview" button.
 * 3) Use edit summaries.

¿SFGi Д nts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 23:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Review by Gaia Octavia Agrippa

You look like the average editor to me. A few points:


 * 1) Your mainspace edits are quite low compared to the rest of your edits.
 * 2) Don't forget to add an edit summary. In "My preferences" there is a option to be notified if you don't add an edit summary, select this as a reminder.
 * 3) When you add refs try not to let them take up masses of room, use only the parts you know when adding a template. Also don't leave them in list form its very annoying for other editors.
 * 4) I you want to be an admin one day try to get involved with anti-vandal work.
 * 5) Bernard Hellring needs a lot more work before you can be really proud of it, but a nice good looking stun. Also its good to see a new comer using refs.

Your doing very well for someone who's only been editing for less than 4 months. Ask your adopter lots of question and you will get somewhere on wikipedia. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk | Sign 20:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool


 * I think this editor ought to become more familiar with the reasons for article deletion. This doesn't reflect the attitude I would want to see in an admin. I admit, that is a small sample size (n=1, :)), but it's what I have seen.  Thank you. Protonk (talk) 06:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC) .  Grr.  Forgot to check the version history on the article he saw.  It was literally one line.  So, my bad, he seems like a pretty good sport. Protonk (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * To be perfectly, PAINFULLY clear, this is the page he saw. I feel sheepish. :| Protonk (talk) 19:30, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I said Big delete because Speedy delete would imply it meets WP:CSD, which I didn't think it met. Mm40|Talk|Sign|Review 22:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Be more liberal with .--Otterathome (talk) 23:40, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I mostly make minor edits. Since I've only made one article, Buzzy Hellring, I think that it is pretty good. I like to do what ever people ask me to.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * There was a silly one with User:Wwesocks about guestbooks. I've also made a couple of mistakes in new page patrolling. I've been told and I learned from them.