Wikipedia:Editor review/Mm40 (3)

Mm40
I've been on Wikipedia for a bit under two years, and I'm thinking of attempting to gain adminship. I don't want to run if I don't have a reasonable chance to pass, so I'd just like to gauge my chances. Thanks, Mm40 (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC) Mm40 (talk) 21:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Content-wise, I'm happy with my 3 DYKs (a fourth on the nomination page, Marisa Wegrzyn) and two FLs (a third in the making, Major League Baseball Most Valuable Player Award. But perhaps my biggest contributions have been my review work. I find that I'm decent at it (at least better than writing my own articles) and there's a definite need for reviewers. In admin areas, my biggest contributions have been made at CSD; I have over 700 deleted contributions, and don't recall a declined speedy in a while. I've also been trying to get involved with UAA, but I still have plenty to learn.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to ) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Because I generally avoid contentious areas, I've not been in any notable disputes. Although there have been a couple disagreements, they generally stem from mistakes on my part and are resolved quickly. If faced with a serious dispute, I would probably do something else for a while (like play chess) and, if the issue doesn't resolve itself, seek comments from uninvolved parties.
 * Because I generally avoid contentious areas, I've not been in any notable disputes. Although there have been a couple disagreements, they generally stem from mistakes on my part and are resolved quickly. If faced with a serious dispute, I would probably do something else for a while (like play chess) and, if the issue doesn't resolve itself, seek comments from uninvolved parties.

 Reviews 
 * I haven't really worked with you that much, but from what I can discern, you seem like a fine editor.  fetch  comms  ☛ 02:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I also wanted to add that you've done some good work with writing and reviewing, and that maybe you should consider working in other areas as well (such as AFC for example). I think that what you would do about editing disputes is a good idea (though issues hardly ever resolve themselves). Overall, I really don't have any complaints from what I have seen.  fetch  comms  ☛ 03:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)