Wikipedia:Editor review/Mrmewe

Mrmewe
I would love to eventually become an admin but would also like to learn more about Wikipedia editing and general policies mrmewe (talk) 21:28, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions

Optional Questions from Doc Quintana  Reviews 
 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Under a different username,I initiated a request for deletion. I primarily have only made grammatical edits.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I haven't been in many, but know that it is important to be diplomatic
 * I haven't been in many, but know that it is important to be diplomatic
 * 1) Why did you come to Wikipedia, and what do you get out of it? Doc Quintana (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Mrmewe, here's my review -it's only a short one as you only have 130 edits!


 * User conduct
 * Edit summaries: I see that you use edit summaries on 88% of your major edits - but they tend to be the default messages - I would suggest that you mention in them what you have done in the edit - it makes it easier for those who have the article on their watchlist to see what's happening!
 * Constructive comments on talk pages: I only see two comments on article talk pages, one of which was not directly connected to the article - and the other was a constructive suggestion about an image in the article.
 * Attitude towards others: Again, there is not much to go on! Most of the messages you leave on user talk pages are warnings about vandalism!


 * Edits
 * Article vs non-article:A quarter of your edits are to articles, with almost half of all your edits being to user talk space. If you intend on continuing with vandal patrol, this is not a problem - but I would say that if you intend on going for adminship in the future, a lot of editors will want to see more article work.


 * Other notes:
 * I see that you have been adopted by Arbitrarily0 - this is an excellent way to improve as an editor. Listen to Arb's advice, ask them questions about anything which you're not sure of!
 * I see that you applied for adminship after very few edits. If you were to consider going for adminship in the future, I would suggest that you have a lot more edits before going for an RfA. Different editors look for different things in an admin - for example, here are my User:Phantomsteve/RfA standards.

Regards, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 09:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)