Wikipedia:Editor review/Mythdon2

Mythdon
I have been contributing to Wikipedia for nearly a year now. I previously had an editor review in October 2008. I wish to be reviewed and would like to hear other editors opinions about my contributing. — Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 00:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My fighting against vandalism is one of the more important contributions as it defends Wikipedia. I have also removed non-sourced information from Wikipedia as information needs to be sourced and have removed "trivia", "notes" and "quotes" sections as they do not belong in Wikipedia.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have been in many edit wars with other editors, mostly on Power Rangers articles, but I try to avoid violating WP:3RR. Sometimes after I cease edit warring, I take the matter into discussion.
 * I have been in many edit wars with other editors, mostly on Power Rangers articles, but I try to avoid violating WP:3RR. Sometimes after I cease edit warring, I take the matter into discussion.

From Jerem43:
 * 1) You seem to have problems when following through with due diligence. Example is the TfD where you made a comment without fully reading the information you were basing you conclusions on. What are you doing to insure that you don't repeat this kind of mistake?
 * 2) The root of the edit wars you engage in appears your refusal to help source information. Why will you not help other contributors by investigating these pieces of disputed data instead of tagging or deleting/blank whole swaths of text?