Wikipedia:Editor review/Narutolovehinata5 (third)

Narutolovehinata5
Hi. It has been a while since my previous one (Which had no response). I am thinking of becoming an admin, so I will have one review before the RFA. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 

You have been doing a good job at Afds and have a great knowledge of Wikipedia's deletion policy. Anyway, you ought to be more careful with your AfD noms. Especially, here you nominated a proded article for an AfD. Also, you have just 351 mainspace edits (20.14% of all your edits) which can be a matter of concern as there is every chance that someone might raise the issue in your RfA and try to present it as a lack of experience. And you should also see to it that you aren't too ruthless in tagging articles as you've done in this case: Anyway, overall, your AfD closures, interaction with users and good understanding of Wikipedia's policies have been fine and I believe, they would see you through.- Ravichandar My coffee shop 15:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * If you are serious about pursuing adminship, here are few things to consider. First, you should weigh in at the RfA discussions for other candidates seeking adminship -- you can get a good idea of what the community is looking for. Second, you may want spend a little more time in the creation of content -- you don't need to create GA/FA material, but starting new entries is seen as a Net positive.  Third, don't overemphasize your interest in adminship -- some people may consider that to be power hungry.  Your work, on the whole, is wonderful and I am glad that you are here.  Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:38, 13 November 2008 (UTC)


 * A username like that and no edits to Naruto-related articles? For shame. ;-) In any case, you're a good vandalism fighter and new page patroller from what I can garner. Be careful on CSDs though. Remember that a mere hoax does not mean that it is a G1 case. Patent nonsense is a very strict defintion that includes solely stuff that is unintelligible or plain gibberish. A hoax is not a G1 case, but rather a G3 case if it is blatant. Prod it if you are unsure. Also, per above, significant mainspace editing will help you. In the past, candidates without significant mainspace editing (doesn't mean you need DYKs/GAs/FAs, but good mainspace contributions outside of merely reverting vandalism is necessary) have been received poorly at RfA, and conversely, people with good history in article writing have been received very positively. As such, I'd recommend that you find an area of interest and start improving articles. In the process, you can interact with other users, gain a better knowledge of the local consensus building process, and how obtaining the admin tools ultimately relates to mainspace editing on a local level. While I said that you don't need any DYKs/GAs/FAs, the former are regarded as signs of significant dedication to mainspace content, and producing one or several (or lots) of the previous examples of quality content is always good. If you are really interested in becoming an administrator, then I would recommend finding an admin coach who can mentor you along the way. In any case, best of luck and happy editing. Cheers, — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 09:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * BTW, I named myself Narutolovehinata5 because I am a fan of Naruto :)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I actually dont seem to have any work I am proud of. Maybe I can just say I am proud of my New PAge patrol work.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I cannot think of any.....
 * I cannot think of any.....