Wikipedia:Editor review/NerdyScienceDude (2)

NerdyScienceDude
My name is NerdyScienceDude, and I have been a Wikipedian since December 2009. My first editor review took place in March, and I have since done a lot more for the encyclopedia. Since then I have started getting DYK credits. I am here to see what improvements could be made to make me admin material since I would find the tools useful. ~ Nerdy Science Dude  (✉ • ✐) 22:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Probably my best contributions would be my DYK articles. I currently as of this writing have seven DYK credits. I am also a vandal-fighter, which I mainly use Igloo to clean up vandalism. I was also involved with the recent reorganization of WikiProject Apple Inc. I have also gotten into the technical side of Wikipedia, which can be shown here. I also plan on participating in the Guild of Copyeditors Backlog Elimination Drive which takes place in July.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have had a few disputes during the course of my editing. Probably the one that caused the most stress was the MFD for my vandalism space. I now don't really care about it anymore, and I have since moved on and continued my wiki-work.
 * I have had a few disputes during the course of my editing. Probably the one that caused the most stress was the MFD for my vandalism space. I now don't really care about it anymore, and I have since moved on and continued my wiki-work.

 Reviews 


 * Your contributions to NASCAR articles have been consistanly good, and I have found you to be a very helpful editor.Sign My Guestbook!·Sumsum2010·Talk 03:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem eager to be around WP:MAC (maybe it's that bright green signature), and I've seen you make some helpful isolated edits to articles. DYK, copyediting, and vandal fighting all give you a diverse but shallow look at Wikipedia. At some point, I think you should adopt an article or two and help them develop over the long term. Nurturing an article over months or even years is one of the most rewarding experiences an editor can have. I also see that you have nearly as many user talk edits as article edits; I think you need to lay off the talk page dongles and doodads. That said, you have far more article edits per month than I do; even though edits are a measure of quantity, which is less important than quality. Keep up the good work. HereToHelp (talk to me) 02:20, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, HereToHelp. Since I am a vandal-fighter, my talk edit count is high since every revert is accompanied with a warning when using automated tools like Twinkle and Igloo. I have been raising my article count up in recent months, and I hope the percentage will be much higher than it is now. ~ Nerdy Science Dude  (✉ • ✐ • ✍) 02:47, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Your signature is hard to read and takes over two lines of edit window. It gets even worse on your own talk page, where your signature is practically indistinguishable from the background. Might want to consider changing that. --erachima talk 20:10, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You're doing good work; keep it up! The best thing you can do is to diversify your contributions. This will expose you to new things and give you experience in a variety of fields. You may even find something new that you like! Airplaneman   ✈  05:10, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm just as old as you, but your signature is way too long and hard to read. Maybe consider a different font. Other than that, keep up the good work! Beluga  boy how's my driving? 11:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Love your work with the WikiProject Apple Inc., keep it up, i'm the same age as you BTW.  Dwayne   was here!   &#9835;  22:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)