Wikipedia:Editor review/Norge0209

Norge0209*
STATEMENT J.A. Hurley (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I've archived this review. Please see the reason listed above. If you wish to be reviewed, please file a new request and remember to transclude it onto the main Editor review page. Netalarm  talk  07:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I have primarily contributed images, and I am particularly pleased with my image on the Carotenosis page because the pictures are of myself, so I now fully understand the topic.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A previous post about Madame Tussaud's in Berlin was deleted; I was upset because I spent a lot of time and effot on putting it together, but I accept whatever Wikipedia's administrators feel is correct. I would like to write more information but have not done so because it does not seem to get accepted. I have a degree in writing and do not want to put so much effort into creating or editing a page when it will be automatically denied.
 * A previous post about Madame Tussaud's in Berlin was deleted; I was upset because I spent a lot of time and effot on putting it together, but I accept whatever Wikipedia's administrators feel is correct. I would like to write more information but have not done so because it does not seem to get accepted. I have a degree in writing and do not want to put so much effort into creating or editing a page when it will be automatically denied.