Wikipedia:Editor review/Nsaa

Nsaa
I've been on Wikipedia for quite a long time (3,5 year), but only recently been very active. Mainly doing reverts of WP:VAN, but also doing some article and template creations (User:Nsaa). In articles I tries to add references and improve the use of ref templates by checking, adding meta information etc. Please be very honest! Nsaa (talk) 19:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * Nsaa you are a great editor and help to WP. You really do a great job patrolling articles against vandalism. I also like the way you handle conflicts, sometimes its just best to step away from arguments or sometimes to request assistance or mediation. I would just recommend editing articles (not just patrolling) but actually contributing to them, in addition to editing areas in WP (other than articles). If you follow this, you will be on your way to becoming the editor you and all of us want you to be, a goof-faith editor on WP.-- TRU  CO   02:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * The (re)creation if Kjell Bloch Sandved was funny even if the sources wasn't abundant. And the creations of Template:ISOWEEKDATE and others (a full set of templates covering the date - ISO week converting, based upon work done on meta)


 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, on the article Papa Dee I was in a long discussion about including some information. In the future I think I will do much of the same, since we here got a common understanding/consensus on how and what to include. The other difficult situation I've been in is the discussion about the Obama connection in the Raila Odinga article Obama connection, WP:NPOV, WP:LIVE, WP:V, WP:WEB (and other treads on the discussion page). In this discussion I just stepped back and stop arguing because we didn't manage to reach any consensus even after trying to get help from other parties. In the future I would have requested more help from other editors (typically people engaged in disputed areas as what is an reliable source and peolpe closer to the subject). Nsaa (talk) 20:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, on the article Papa Dee I was in a long discussion about including some information. In the future I think I will do much of the same, since we here got a common understanding/consensus on how and what to include. The other difficult situation I've been in is the discussion about the Obama connection in the Raila Odinga article Obama connection, WP:NPOV, WP:LIVE, WP:V, WP:WEB (and other treads on the discussion page). In this discussion I just stepped back and stop arguing because we didn't manage to reach any consensus even after trying to get help from other parties. In the future I would have requested more help from other editors (typically people engaged in disputed areas as what is an reliable source and peolpe closer to the subject). Nsaa (talk) 20:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)