Wikipedia:Editor review/Paul2387

Paul2387
Paul2387 (talk) 03:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I mainly contribute to article related to TV or Film
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have had a few edit dispute but managed to sort them by discussing on relevant talk pages, and I'll carry on doing this in the future
 * I have had a few edit dispute but managed to sort them by discussing on relevant talk pages, and I'll carry on doing this in the future

 Reviews 


 * Hi Paul2387! On to my review...


 * User conduct
 * Edit summaries: You have only used edit summaries on 3/4 of your major edits and 2/3 of your minor ones. Edit summaries are useful as they show other editors what the purpose of your edit was without having to necessarily look at the edit itself. If you don't use them, it's harder to know what is happening!
 * Constructive comments on talk pages: The comments I can see on article talk pages are geared towards improving the article.
 * Attitude towards others: Again, there's not much to go on yet, but I don't see any major problems in this area.


 *  Edits
 * Automated Edits: Just over 7% of your edits are automated (using Twinkle, AWB and Friendly)
 * Article vs non-article: About 45% of your edits are on articles, with a further 20% on user pages. I don't see any major problems with your edits.


 * Summary
 * Use edit summaries for every edit. If you go to my preferences, under the Editing tab there is a box that you can tick to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary"
 * As said at your last Editor review in September 2009, you should wait at least 6 months before even considering adminship. I'd say the same - wait at least another 6 months. Looking at your RfAs (14 July 2009, 26 November 2009, 14 December 2009 and 31 December 2009), they all say the same thing: you aren't ready. Read through them all, see what they said. You seem too keen to be an admin, without really showing that you need the tools. As  said on your last RfA Please stop chasing adminship, settle in and become an established editor (ie by editing, not by existing) before requesting the tools
 * Do not change your user name again! It's easy enough to see your past names ( -> ->, so I'm not sure what the purpose was!


 * I hope this gives you some things to think about! Regards, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 00:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)