Wikipedia:Editor review/PaulTanenbaum

PaulTanenbaum
I'm fairly new to Wikipedia. In my own content contributions, I'm scrupulous about style, clarity, and content accuracy, as well as scholarly integrity. I don't want to be too rigid for the culture of Wikipedia PaulTanenbaum 02:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

Overall excellent, I just have one comment to make; templates like the leage of copyeditors credits should be put on the talk page not on the article page. Sorry I cant give you a more through review, I must go do some homework. -Icewedge 04:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Your edits so far are excellent; you have made some very good edits, like the one to the United States Army Research Laboratory article. You have used the edit summaries quite regularly and that is fine and good; there is an option in the "My preferences" button at the top right section of your monitor. It will not allow you to save any changes you have made unless you entered an edit summary. Use it if you like. And finally, this is merely optional, but you would do better if you cite your sources; that is, you insert the web page/ book/ article where you got your information from. Its not likely to happen, but sometimes, your edits may be removed if you do not cite them. Take a look at WP:CITE. I've seen very nice stuff; keep up the good work! If any of my comments have hurt you in some way of other, I would like to apologize. Cheers, Zachary  crimsonwolf  14:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Oh, I dunno... I think I cleaned up necessary and sufficient nicely.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, I squabbled recently with user:Trovatore on talk:set about the article's target audience: mathematical expert vs. general reader. I tried my best to be calm and non-judgemental, don't think either of us budged.  I just let it be, and as far as I know the article itself remains unchanged (i.e. I never undid his revert of my edit).