Wikipedia:Editor review/Peachypoh

Peachypoh
I've been editing Wikipedia for about 2 [not 3 - sorry, memory fails] years now, but have not received any feedback on my talk page. I'd like to know what others think of my editing. Peachypoh (talk) 07:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * 1) Hello. You haven't been in any conflicts or anything, or been blocked, so that's a plus. Despite being here for two years+, however, you only have about 200 edits. Which isn't that bad really. Quite a lot when you think about it. Your edits are confined mainly to gnoming, but we need people who correct spelling, or maintain the Wiki in other ways, otherwise it would fall to pieces within days. You could benefit from a little more experience in other areas, though, perhaps some participation at WP:AfD or in WP:RfAs or something like that. If you're interested, maybe even a little vandal fighting. But if you're not interested in braching out into other areas, that's fine, ignore what I just said. Sorry for the poor quality of this review, Lord Spongefrog  (review)   (I am Czar of all Russias)  18:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I generally correct bad grammar and spelling when I come across them. The edits which I feel partcularly pleased about are the minor spelling edit to Template:elementbox (which appeared on all the element pages and had gone unnoticed for a long time) and the rewording of Qiu Fazu, even though that was not finished.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I haven't been in any editing disputes before, because my editing is mainly for S&G.
 * I haven't been in any editing disputes before, because my editing is mainly for S&G.