Wikipedia:Editor review/Peter.C

Peter.C
Hi, I'm Peter and I want to be reviewed to know what the wiki community thinks of me and if they could guide me on what I should do now. Peter.C •  talk  21:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I mostly do vandal fighting although now I am leaning more tward editing medical and video game articles. I wonder if I should stick with vandal fighting and or if I should move most of my work expanding articles.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Never really had a dispute on Wikipedia although I do have some bad blood with a user on IRC. Now I just /ignore him.
 * Never really had a dispute on Wikipedia although I do have some bad blood with a user on IRC. Now I just /ignore him.

 Reviews 


 * 1) Great to have another keen editor at WP:MED. Getting involved with more editing of content will make you a more well rounded editor ie get into the trenches.  A good way to get the feel of things is attempting to bring an article to WP:GAN.  I have many suggestions if you are interested. Cheers,  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 02:42, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I like the edit stats, but I would wonder if you have participated in XfD. Also, participation in RfAs is great. If you want to RfA yourself, you might cut back on the Huggling, as many editors do not like to see huge percentages of automated edits. It is nice though, to see another editor at WP:MED. If you have any questions regarding medical articles, feel free to ask me (I'm a cardiothoracic surgeon, so I would know cardio better than, say, nephro) Ronk01   talk  02:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)