Wikipedia:Editor review/Pondle

Pondle*
I've been editing for a number of years now, but never had a review - I figured it was time for an objective perspective on my work. Pondle (talk) 17:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I've archived this review. Please see the reason listed above. If you wish to be reviewed, please file a new request and remember to transclude it onto the main Editor review page. Netalarm  talk  07:11, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I've made a substantial contribution to a range of Wales-related articles - for example, Economy of Wales now has up-to-date info on employment and GVA, plus a good summary of regional variations and policy issues. I've also created or helped to improve articles on relatively obscure places or public bodies, such as the UK Commission for Employment and Skills - it's not glamorous work but someone's got to do it.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I've had disputes with a couple of users; while I can be a robust debater, I think that my arguments are based on reliable sources and I try to be polite, focusing on content not contributor. I've never knowingly breached WP:NPA or WP:3RR. Most of the disputes I've been involved in have been resolved successfully on talk pages. I like to think that I'm happy to abide by WP:CONSENSUS, even when things don't entirely go my way.
 * I've had disputes with a couple of users; while I can be a robust debater, I think that my arguments are based on reliable sources and I try to be polite, focusing on content not contributor. I've never knowingly breached WP:NPA or WP:3RR. Most of the disputes I've been involved in have been resolved successfully on talk pages. I like to think that I'm happy to abide by WP:CONSENSUS, even when things don't entirely go my way.