Wikipedia:Editor review/Pyfan (2)

Pyfan
Hi, I've been here for a year and eight months now and I just wanted to see how I was going, thank you for taking the time to review me. &mdash; Oli OR Pyfan! 10:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * A lot (about 60% according to X! tools) of my contributions are vandalism reversion. I have also started this article and rewritten almost the entire Great Expectations article.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to ) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have never been in any major disputes. All the quarrels I've had here will be here: User talk:Pyfan/Archive 1 or on my Talk page, but I don't feel any of those are worthy of a mention here.
 * I have never been in any major disputes. All the quarrels I've had here will be here: User talk:Pyfan/Archive 1 or on my Talk page, but I don't feel any of those are worthy of a mention here.

 Reviews  Hi Pyfan! I have reviewed your recent speedy deletion nominations. I did not find any blatant mistakes, you seem to do good work in this area. Keep it up! Regards, decltype (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Review by :
 *  Kaiser’s Tengelmann - tagged by you as A1 (no context), but the image and caption was enough to identify the article's subject. The article did however meet A3 (no meaningful content).