Wikipedia:Editor review/RJR3333

RJR3333
STATEMENT RJR3333 (talk) 00:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * A lot of my edits have been to the age of consent/age of majority project.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Flyer22 has discussed the possibility of requesting a topic ban on me, although she has not done so yet. She says that my edits are sloppy,erratic, careless and not sourced. I dealt with it at first by asking neutral editors for help but they won't. Flyer22 also claims that I have a bias that the age of consent should be 18, but that is false, my position on the issue is that it should be 16, so her bias accusation is not true. I do not know if her other contentions against my work are valid though. Can anyone comment?
 * Flyer22 has discussed the possibility of requesting a topic ban on me, although she has not done so yet. She says that my edits are sloppy,erratic, careless and not sourced. I dealt with it at first by asking neutral editors for help but they won't. Flyer22 also claims that I have a bias that the age of consent should be 18, but that is false, my position on the issue is that it should be 16, so her bias accusation is not true. I do not know if her other contentions against my work are valid though. Can anyone comment?

 Reviews 


 * Question for the requestor. Are you still editing? You left a note here saying you are taking down all your edits. In puzzlement, GeorgeLouis (talk) 02:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am still editing. --RJR3333 (talk) 05:35, 7 July 2012 (UTC)