Wikipedia:Editor review/Raeky

Raeky*
I'm a long user of Wikipedia and firmly believe in it's mission statement and goals. I take a strong policy stance, and have taken great effort to familiarize myself with all the useful policies governing editing. My main focus when I edit is usually to either patrol pages for POV pushing editors or vandalism within some narrow pseudoscience and creation/evolution related pages. I also contribute heavily at the Featured Picture process and have nominated, uploaded and contributed MANY images during my tenure. Although I've been involved in some disputes, I'd like to know if anything in my past would rule me out from applying for adminship in the future, or of there is some behavior changes I should make. — raeky  t  17:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)\

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I've pretty much been mostly focused on reviewing and adding pictorial content to wikipedia. There's a couple article's I created specificly for pictures (Elakala Falls and The Periodic Table of Videos). I've also done quite a lot of anti-vandalism patrolling and have in my watchlist many Pseudoscience Evolution/Creation type articles that I watch for POV editors and POV-Pushers.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Patrolling Pseudoscience  articles and Evolution/Creation articles for POV editos and pushers, and vandalism, often turns up some problematic editors who are editing just under the threshold of vandalism but obviously WP:TE editors and cause quite a lot of stress dealing with them until they ultimately flame out with a ban, and they almost always do or give up. As a result I've been discussed at ANI and been involved in disputes...
 * 1) What do you want to get out of this editor review? Are you thinking of running for adminship? Would you like feedback on a specific area of your editing? Or would you just like a general review of your edits?
 * I'm aware of the deficit in admin promotion and although I have a checkered past at times with dealing with problem editors, I feel that I have a very firm grasp on policy from my years of editing, and would consider running for adminship at some point if it's possible. So a review of my past editing history with that in mind would be useful.

 Reviews