Wikipedia:Editor review/Realist2

Realist2
Hi folks, I just wanted some feedback on how I'm doing. — R  2  15:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * Realist, as of late you are doing fine on Wikipedia. I noticed your contributions and saw that you edit many articles regularly. I, however, recommend that you edit other areas of Wikipedia, not just articles, such as WP:XFD or even here at WP:ER. In the future, when in a conflict, remain civil and (like you stated) seek help from other editors, or sometimes its best to just walk away from a conflict. Best, -- ₮ RU  C Ө   19:59, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The blocks from a year ago a little disappointing, but they are from a year ago. By contrast, you have lots of nice stuff on your userpage with regards to adopting and thereby helping out inexperienced editors as well as with GA/FA class articles.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 00:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * How the hell are you not an admin yet? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  04:43, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I withdrew on about 80% support, off Wiki stuff, long story. I'm quite happy now, I really don't need the tolls that much. — R  2  13:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Julian is right though, you should get the mop sooner or later anyway. No need is not a good reason not to, you might be able to do some good with it and every bit counts ;-)  So Why  23:13, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. Realist is a very trust-worthy editor and I fully support/endorse him. MaJic  ( talk ) 16:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions

1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Getting Michael Jackson to FA was pleasing, but highly stressful. It's where I got all my policy knowledge, writing and rewriting it as I discovered more and more.

2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Get into loads of conflicts, it comes with the territory. Usually I just seek the input of other sane editors, things then get fixed.

''' Any other comments? '''

I want this to stay open a little longer, so adding a new section to stop it archiving. — R  2  04:00, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you're a great editor. I'm more than willing to look past your past blocks, but I know that Wikipedians have a way of holding things against others. You have been one of the most prolific editors I have encountered and I applaud you for your work. Please keep it up. Oran e   (talk)  00:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm also pleased at how great an editor you've become: you're polite, helpful, reasonable, a hard-worker, and are a huge contributor of content. You are good in dealing with BLP issues and disputes (especially on Lady Gaga), and from my observations of your behavior and work these last few months, I believe that your past problems are gone: you are truly one of our best editors. Please continue the excellent work you do, and please consider running for adminship again at some stage: I think you'll be a fine administrator. Acalamari 16:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)