Wikipedia:Editor review/Redmarkviolinist 3

Redmarkviolinist
I feel that I could use a review. I would like to run for adminship, and I was wondering if I could get some constructive feedback on this choice. Cheers,  Ṝέđ ṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ  Drop me a line''' 21:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 

Feel like I should review you when I finally realized you reviewed me. Very good administrative work there, and very all-rounded, but if you want to go for an RFA, try getting an Admin Coach first before going for it. They might have more advice. Leujohn ( talk, How did I do? ) 09:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


 * If you really want to be an admin (I'm not even going to put up the pretense that editor review is ever used for anything but a prequel to adminship; well, except, paraxodically, for admins who put up their reviews for the simple reason that they wish to prove that they don't want people to think that they consider ER simply a prerequisite for adminship.), go ahead and nominate yourself. In my opinion, you've done fairly good work; not that that will matter much at RfA. I don't expect you to pass now or ever, unless you do some purposeful and blatant sucking up to the current trends and establishment, but surprise me. (Cynical? Who, me?) Nousernamesleft (talk) 02:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Some of my best work would include the Battle of Marion, Siege of Calcutta, and Battle of Appomattox Station. In WP:MILHIST, I evaluate A-class reviews, and assess articles. I also tag a few CSD's and participate in AFD's.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Only one instance. See User:Redmarkviolinist/Stress
 * Only one instance. See User:Redmarkviolinist/Stress