Wikipedia:Editor review/Riley Huntley (2)

Riley Huntley (2)
Since my last editor review (started in July), I feel that I have furthered my involvement with Wikipedia and I would appreciate comments on if I have improved and how I could improve more. I invite you to be bold and blunt if necessary. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley  talk 21:38, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions to Wikipedia are vandalism reverts, file moving, marking CSD's and creating accounts with the ACC interface. For content work, I create or five-fold articles for DYK.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * To my knowledge, I have never been in a editing dispute. I would respond to an editing dispute by leaving a message on the talk page of the users involved about the three revert rule, start a discussion on the articles talk page and inform Administrators about the conflict on the administrators' noticeboard.
 * To my knowledge, I have never been in a editing dispute. I would respond to an editing dispute by leaving a message on the talk page of the users involved about the three revert rule, start a discussion on the articles talk page and inform Administrators about the conflict on the administrators' noticeboard.

 Reviews