Wikipedia:Editor review/Rockchalk717

Rockchalk717
I have been a frequent editor here for almost a year and I'm interested in getting some feedback on how I am doing on Wikipedia. Had some issues when I started but I feel I have resolved them Rockchalk717 (talk) 06:49, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions have beenn to American football and basketball related pages, with the occasional movie or musician page. I am mostly proud of my multiple contributions to the article Wichita South High School . I have helped build the article from being full of unsourced information to adding sources where necessary and by adding notable facts.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * My first edit dispute was over Carson Palmer and it wound up with me unnecessarily reporting an admin (Eagles247 to ANI. Afterwards I issued a truce to apologize for my actions. I will admit I handled that one poorly, but in future edit disputes I post either on the article talk page or the user's to resolve the issue.
 * My first edit dispute was over Carson Palmer and it wound up with me unnecessarily reporting an admin (Eagles247 to ANI. Afterwards I issued a truce to apologize for my actions. I will admit I handled that one poorly, but in future edit disputes I post either on the article talk page or the user's to resolve the issue.

 Reviews 
 * Review from  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat}
 * 88% article edits is good, nice high contib rate, 4 articles created. Primarily Sport articles, nothing controversial, no involvement in Wiki drama. You might want to consider helping WikiProject American football in meeting their goals (no pun intended).
 * Communication seems good, your explanation to an IP-editor (User talk:71.180.203.153) was very nicely done, not patronising, nor condescending after they asked what CITEKILL meant. Thought your apology to Eagles 24/7 was modest and well-handled.
 * Detailed edit summaries are being left a lot of the time, perhaps 50–70% of edits, but still many instances where no summary is being left. A brief summary should usually be given.
 * Your talk page opens with "I would like to keep this at 20 threads so please remove the top most thread when starting a new one, thanks." It's not normal practice for editors to delete stuff from other editors user pages, and not may will, even with permission, but you might want to look at Archiving, also you can freely use User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo to handle this for you, very easily.
 * In case you weren't aware, the High School article you're most proud of currently has some red invalid ref errors.
 * Keep up the good efforts!  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh {chat} 01:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)