Wikipedia:Editor review/Rockfang

Rockfang
Something about myself. Hmm. Well, a good chunk of my editing here on Wikipedia deals with images. Either tagging them for missing sources/licenses or moving them to Commons if applicable. I like to do maintenance type stuff a lot. Like category renames, etc. I'd like to be reviewed to see if there is anything I could do better, or perhaps more efficiently. Any suggestions on where I might expand my editing habits to would be appreciated as well. Rockfang (talk) 18:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hello. Rockfang you do a task which many of us wouldn't dream of doing, tagging all those images :) Keep up the good work, as it benefits the community a lot. I was looking through your edit history, and I notice you do a lot of script assisted work. While this is helpful, it doesn't benefit you as much as you don't learn more on Wikipedia editing. I recommend editing/expanding articles manually, and you can learn from this experience and in the future you can apply that with your scripts. I also notice that you edit rarely on the Wikipedia space, I suggest participating at WP:XFD, WP:AVI, or even here at WP:ER. It also seems that you don't really edit war or get into altercations, which is great. Keep that up ;)-- T ru  c o   20:56, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Well, I don't really spend a lot of time on one particular article or task or anything. I like to vary my editing tasks a bit.  But, if I had to give one thing, it would probably be the number of images I move to Commons from here.  The CommonsHelper helps out quite a bit with that.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Back around December of '07 I was being stubborn about when Reflist should be used compared to . You can read more about that here and here.  Back then, I was irritated, but looking back, I can see how I was being stubborn.
 * Back around December of '07 I was being stubborn about when Reflist should be used compared to . You can read more about that here and here.  Back then, I was irritated, but looking back, I can see how I was being stubborn.

Any additional reviewers perchance?
Creating another section to temporarily stop archiving and possibly get more reviews. --Rockfang (talk) 04:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)