Wikipedia:Editor review/Rowing88

Rowing88
STATEMENT Rowing88 16:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hello. I suggest you read this. Regardless of what Davenport does, Wikipedia is not the place to take him down, and fighting over another editor will not solve anything. If the editor in question is Goalsended, he can not personally block you, as he is not an admin. My suggestion is to move on to editing other articles now, and come back to this in a few weeks, and do not engage in a flame war, doing so can get you banned by an admin. As for your actual edits, I suggest going to my preferences, click on the editing tab, and check off the last option which forces you to make edit summaries, whereas your count is very low. I hope this has helped, and, moreover, I hope you make the right decision. Wishes, wpktsfs 02:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I have recently been arguing with a person over the page of Lord Edward Davenport. This user has left several rather odd messages on my talk page asking me to moderate my behavior, and threatening to ban me if I continued with my version of the article. I have left multiple sources which I believe can back up all of my information, and we are now engaging in a flame war. I therefore must ask an editor to please review my behavior to correct me if I am wrong.


 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, a user by the name of User:Goalsended has persisted oddly in defending a con-artist by the name of Lord Davenport, who besides not actually being a lord, has stolen vast amounts of money and even a bloody embassy from a struggling African nation for his personal use. I am frankly quite flustered over this incident and hope that I may go on to editing other articles after I have finished with this debacle.
 * Yes, a user by the name of User:Goalsended has persisted oddly in defending a con-artist by the name of Lord Davenport, who besides not actually being a lord, has stolen vast amounts of money and even a bloody embassy from a struggling African nation for his personal use. I am frankly quite flustered over this incident and hope that I may go on to editing other articles after I have finished with this debacle.