Wikipedia:Editor review/Runewiki777

Runewiki777
I have been editing Wikipedia for a couple of monthes now. I would like to know what users think of my edits. Ru n eW i ki    777 17:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

It's good to correct spelling mistakes. It's even better to improve the content of articles by adding references, categories, links, tables and images. I noticed that the article you pointed to on your userpage, which is "not yet deleted", is tagged as unreferenced. Maybe you can add a reference or two.

Your strength lies in your pleasant user interactions. I saw several comments on your talk page, thanking you for improving someone else's signature or userpage. Though community building is not the only pursuit on Wikipedia, it helps keep people motivated to volunteer their best work.

I wish you good luck. Shalom Hello 18:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I am pleased by the amount of typos I fixed. Nobody seems to care about typos. I for one, care.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * In the past, I had wrong fully accused an admin for being a sockpuppeter. I thought a certain admin was creating socks and vandalising with them, while his admin account was reverting the vandalism for the sole purpose of making himself look good. 
 * In the past, I had wrong fully accused an admin for being a sockpuppeter. I thought a certain admin was creating socks and vandalising with them, while his admin account was reverting the vandalism for the sole purpose of making himself look good.