Wikipedia:Editor review/STATicVerseatide 2

STATicVerseatide
Well I was reviewed in July of 2010 and since I have aquired rollback, reveiwer, file mover and IP exemption rights and have matured as an editor having reached my anniversary since starting my account. I would just like an update on how good my contribuations are.  STATic  message me!  00:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Previous editor review: July 2010

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contribuations are to hip hop music BLPs, album and song articles with edits also in other topics. Along with being a strict vandalism patroler on the articles I watch (over 300).
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Early in editing I would get in disputes with editors but recently I know how it works and know my place and discuss instead of dispute.
 * Early in editing I would get in disputes with editors but recently I know how it works and know my place and discuss instead of dispute.

 Reviews  Well, I will try and do my best to help you.
 * 1) You are doing well with writing edit summaries. However, some of them (such as "09:35, May 15, 2011 (diff | hist) We the Best Forever ‎ (→Confirmed tracks: f this unsourced crap. Thats just unessasary. add ref)" may be viewed as unconstructive and against Wikiquette. Also, most of them are really short.
 * 2) You have many, many, many, many edits to hip hop articles, as you noted above. I am not an expert about (nor a fan of, to be honest) hip hop, so I cannot check the quality and veracity of your edits there.
 * 3) Your vandalism reversion seems to be spot on.
 * 4) Your interactions with other users on talk pages, like shown here and here, seem to be polite and on-policy.
 * 5) You are very active with article protection and vandalism reports, which is good to see. Some of your comments, like in this AFD discussion, may be misinterpreted as personal attacks (although you clearly do not mean them as such).
 * 6) Your other edits, like at this template, seem to be just what the encyclopedia ordered.
 * Hope that helps. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)