Wikipedia:Editor review/Sapphire Flame

Sapphire Flame
STATEMENT Sapphire Flame 15:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * It is difficult to review with only 134 edits. My advice ... keep editing, ask for help from your adoptor when you run into trouble, and spend some time reading the Wikipedia policy pages and guideline pages.  Other than that, my only other comment would be to make sure you provide edit summaries -- you do pretty well at that, but there is room for improvement.  Keep at it.  -- Pastordavid 20:45, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Not really, I'm afraid. My school's filter prevents me from looking for sources, reducing me to a mere wikignome. 
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Well, I made the mistake of making an article about my school, and before you know it, it's a vandalism magnet. I put up warnings in the talk page, the IP's talk page, and it was finally banned. It only increased my hatred of vandals who exist only to post stupid messages *takes deep breaths*. All right, I'm fine now. I really want to be more useful to this site, so any advice or things for me to do would be great.
 * 1) What activities on Wikipedia have you enjoyed the most?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. I guess I like using the random article feature and seeing if the page I arrive at needs improvement. Since I have Firefox, I can use a spell checker to scan the page. Of course, regional language differences is one hitch in my plan. 
 * 1) What do you like the most about Wikipedia as an encyclopedia?   Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well... I like the scope of all its coverage. If you want to know about it, you'll find the most up to date information here. And if you don't like what you find, you can edit it. 
 * 1) What do you consider as your area of greatest wiki-expertise?  What key advice do you have for others concerning that area?   Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikignome activities, probably. I'm a little timid when it comes to editing articles and I'm not too good at finding sources, so I like to categorize articles and fix glaring typos. 
 * Well... I like the scope of all its coverage. If you want to know about it, you'll find the most up to date information here. And if you don't like what you find, you can edit it. 
 * 1) What do you consider as your area of greatest wiki-expertise?  What key advice do you have for others concerning that area?   Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikignome activities, probably. I'm a little timid when it comes to editing articles and I'm not too good at finding sources, so I like to categorize articles and fix glaring typos. 
 * Wikignome activities, probably. I'm a little timid when it comes to editing articles and I'm not too good at finding sources, so I like to categorize articles and fix glaring typos.