Wikipedia:Editor review/Scetoaux


 * The following discussion is an archived editor review. Please do not modify it. If you wish to request a new editor review, please follow the instructions here.

Scetoaux
I've been a member of Wikipedia since March 2006, but my editing has been rather sporadic. My active contributions to Wikipedia started at around February of this year. I'm currently undergoing admin coaching with Malinaccier at User:Scetoaux/Admin coaching, aiming for maybe a July or August RFA. I'm mainly a wikignome and recent changes patroller for antivandalism work, but I have also created some articles and made significant expansions or work on others. &mdash; scetoaux (T|C)  01:13, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * You might want to shoot for creating new articles and nominating them for DYK?, or expand them to GA or FA status. Otger than that, you're doing a good job. Editorofthewikireview my edits here! 11:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your suggestions. &mdash; scetoaux (T|C)  22:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm rather pleased with my contributions to articles related to the Civil Air Patrol. I have made significant changes to the Civil Air Patrol article, the History of the Civil Air Patrol article, and have created the Maryland Wing Civil Air Patrol article.  Other articles I have created are Poverty's No Crime and L-Tronics.  I have also done significant work on Maryland High School Assessments and Continuum (instrument)
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Certainly I have been in conflicts over editing. I generally hold myself to a 1 revert rule, although I have never explicitly stated this.  If a change of mine is reverted, I always discuss with other editors before changing an article back to my version.  More important to me than having my contributions included is the prevention of edit wars.
 * Certainly I have been in conflicts over editing. I generally hold myself to a 1 revert rule, although I have never explicitly stated this.  If a change of mine is reverted, I always discuss with other editors before changing an article back to my version.  More important to me than having my contributions included is the prevention of edit wars.