Wikipedia:Editor review/SchfiftyThree (2)

SchfiftyThree
I Schfifty  3  18:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I usually do not attempt to participate in huge consensus-building discussions, but I instead rather act as a WikiGnome. I also have appreciation for my vandalism work here, and it has been one of my greatest efforts since early 2008.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * This used to happen with User:ClueBot but now it's happening with other users. I sometimes have undergone stress due to the activity of Huggle users, particularly when someone uses it nearly every day in one year. I cannot imagine how someone always devotes their time using the program. As to why this is in an editor review, I just want to hear from some others.
 * This used to happen with User:ClueBot but now it's happening with other users. I sometimes have undergone stress due to the activity of Huggle users, particularly when someone uses it nearly every day in one year. I cannot imagine how someone always devotes their time using the program. As to why this is in an editor review, I just want to hear from some others.

'''Please note that this user was previously reviewed in June 2008. See Editor review/SchfiftyThree'''

 Reviews 


 * Hi SchfiftyThree, sorry for the delay in getting a review for you - we're slowly catching up with the backlog! On to my review...


 * User conduct
 * Edit summaries: You are using summaries most of the time, which is useful for other editors who have the page on their watchlist. I noticed that edit summaries were mentioned at your last ER - it is good that you paid attention to the comment made!
 * Constructive comments on talk pages: most of the edits I can see are the automatic ones left when you perform rollback. I noticed some constructive comments on Wikipedia Talk and Template Talk, making suggestions for improvements, or queries about possible problems that you had noticed.
 * Attitude towards others: You seem to have a positive attitude towards other editors from what I can see of your comments to them. I also noticed that you had a few people state that they would miss you during your WikiBreak in March - this shows me that they respect you, and realise that you are doing a good job!


 *  Edits
 * Automated Edits: Approximately a quarter of your edits are automated (mainly using Huggle, which I see that you have embraced following your comments at your last ER!). Huggle is a very useful tool - and from what I can see, you are using it accurately.
 * Article vs non-article: Half of your edits are on articles. I noticed that you have created 8 articles which are on Wikipedia (as I am not admin, I can't see if there are any that you created which have since been deleted), but I notice that the last one you created (List of international game shows) was in February 2009 - I hope this does not mean that you won't be creating any more articles! Your edits on articles are good, and help to improve them.


 * Summary
 * You seem to have benefited from your Wikibreak from March to October last year - sometimes getting away for a bit can be useful (or so they tell me, anyway!)
 * You seem to have taken on board the comments made at your last Editor Review, which is always a good sign - it shows that you are willing to take this process seriously!
 * In common with an editor who commented at your last ER, I am surprised about your answer to question 2: the good thing about Huggle is that obvious vandalism can be reverted very quickly - as you have found, being a user of it yourself! I'm not sure why it would cause you stress - surely they are just doing what you would have done if you had seen it a few seconds before them? But that's the only "negative" I can come up with.


 * I hope this is helpful. Regards, --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 13:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)