Wikipedia:Editor review/Sd31415

Sd31415
Statement

&emsp;Sd31415 (talk • contribs)&emsp; This is my first editor review, and I would like to know not just how am I doing, but also how I can improve. More information about me can be found in my answers to my questions. I have no intention for an RFA anytime soon; I would like to just focus on my contributions as an editor. However, if a user wants to review me as a RFA candidate, go right ahead! All comments and questions are appreciated! — S .D.   ¿п?  21:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * Here is the (in)famous royal review, as always I will review form an Administrative candidates viewpoint. Arjun  22:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)




 * Overall Edit Count: 2,701, looks like a good total for less than 3 months. Most Rfa voters like to see at least 3,000 edits and of course you are getting close to that total, so keep it up.
 * Mainspace: very high, sweet total, I like seeing a high total as that is why we joined wikipeda. I also see some RC patrol which is nice. I would recomend adding Pop ups to your Monobook. This will make editing much easier.
 * Wikipedia: once again a pretty good total, I see XFD's which is excellent, keep it up. Also your work on WP:FAC, WP:FPC, featured portal candidates is great, :)
 * User talk: No probs here, I always like admins that converse with other users, this is excellent. You aren't afraid to ask questions and that is a quality that is great. However I see no vandalism warnings, I highly recomend warning the vandals as not doing so can kill you on a future RFA. Here are some warning templates, make sure you "subst your templates too.
 * Civility: very civil, great, great, great is all I can say. Always remain civil failing to do so can hurt later on. However directing my attention to the block that you just received, The block hurts as I know, this block even if you were telling the truth. I recomend that you wait a little longer for an RFA since some RFAers may oppose due to this. I have seen users come back after blocks and become admins, and I think you will to. So wait longer and I am sure that it won't be a huge factor.
 * Kindness: One word yes, you are, great, no problems here :)
 * Edit summerys: Always so a very good job. You appear to use an edit summery for every edit. Also your edit summerys are great, meaning that you don't use silly abbreviations such as "rv" or "fix" as those don't help...so great job :).
 * Portal: low I would recomend you edit some of your favorite portal that are in despair as they just need some love :). But I notice that you are a portal peer reviewer which that pretty much makes up for it anyway. So basically you know what talking about.
 * Other: Email is on which is very good for admins to have. Very nice user page, helpful and beautiful :p. Also the sig is a little long but I don't think that it would be a big deal on an RFA as it fits the guidelines.
 * I would personally nominate you for admin, in fact your name is now here. You are a level headed user and are making great process. If you have any questions please contact me by email or my talk page. Cheers and keep it up. Happy editing :). Arjun  22:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Portal: low I would recomend you edit some of your favorite portal that are in despair as they just need some love :). But I notice that you are a portal peer reviewer which that pretty much makes up for it anyway. So basically you know what talking about.
 * Other: Email is on which is very good for admins to have. Very nice user page, helpful and beautiful :p. Also the sig is a little long but I don't think that it would be a big deal on an RFA as it fits the guidelines.
 * I would personally nominate you for admin, in fact your name is now here. You are a level headed user and are making great process. If you have any questions please contact me by email or my talk page. Cheers and keep it up. Happy editing :). Arjun  22:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I would personally nominate you for admin, in fact your name is now here. You are a level headed user and are making great process. If you have any questions please contact me by email or my talk page. Cheers and keep it up. Happy editing :). Arjun  22:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Responded to Arjun's comments on his talk page. — S .D.   ¿п?  23:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * &emsp;Answer&emsp; I am a WikiGnome, so I make small changes to any article I come across. I sometimes do random page and recent changes patrolling. I also think I improved the article Hunting weapon a lot. See before my changes and after. — S .D.   ¿п?  22:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?''
 * &emsp;Answer&emsp; Last week, I was blocked indefinitely for being a sockpuppet of Tooj117 (talk • contribs), established by CheckUser. In my opinion, I calmly answered the questions that were given to me (after all my efforts seemed to be to no avail, I at last gave up editing my talk page and was about to e-mail Ohnoitsjamie but I was unblocked by my blocking sysop, Mackensen). I always strive (and in my opinion, succeed) in being civil to all users. — S .D.   ¿п?  22:07, 14 January 2007 (UTC)