Wikipedia:Editor review/Segilla

Segilla
No feedback ever on my edits. Misspellings irritate me (but I make typos, alas! Need to be assured that contributions are generally acceptable and that doing them in stages in an article is an acceptable practise. Segilla (talk) 23:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * typo and grammatical corrections. Enjoyed editing the explorer Baker article into standard English
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Would concede unless I was absolutely sure of my ground. Although sometimes tempted, I would not expect to get involved in matters of opinion or of adding information from personal memory.
 * Would concede unless I was absolutely sure of my ground. Although sometimes tempted, I would not expect to get involved in matters of opinion or of adding information from personal memory.

 Reviews 


 * Such is the life of a WikiGnome to sit here for over 3 months without a review. But no more! Spelling and grammar errors drive me up the wall, so I truly appreciate your efforts. In nearly all cases, your edits have been great. The way this place works is that people will let you know when things aren't so fine, especially if there is any pattern of trouble. So, no news is good news. One suggestion I have is to be bolder. For example, your most recent batch of edits to Samuel Baker were good, but they could have been better. "Esteemed" usually refers to a person, not hair. The sentence regarding her death had 7 commas and was nearly unintelligible. These problems weren't of your making. However, gnomes are in short supply so if you take the time to clean up an article, please go as far as you can because it's doubtful that someone else will be by anytime soon to make it better. In one case, you left an inappropriate comment on the talk page of a WP:BLP. Even though it's a talk page, we still have pretty strict rules on anything regarding a living person. Without a source there's no way that someone else would have added it to the article, so leaving it on the talk page that way doesn't do much good. I've already taken care of it. If you want a review of specific edits in the future, please include the applicable links in your request to make it easier on us. Thanks again! —UncleDouggie (talk) 08:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)