Wikipedia:Editor review/Selmo

User:Selmo
Yay- I never knew there was a user equivilant to peer review. I think I'm due for some more constructive criticism. -- Selmo  (talk) 00:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * Hello Selmo, greetings from your home city (Burnaby, Vancouver)! Great job on the Vancouver article ! ! ! !

Your previous RFA was apparently not closed. Interesting.. I just closed it for you.


 * You have been a very active editor for the past four months. If you remain to be like this for another 1-2 months, you'll be in a good position by then. I see you are actively participating in Wikipedia's deletion discussions, and reasonable number of reports in WP:AIV and WP:PAIN, although some of the reports were questioned in your previous RFA. Some of the objections from your previous RFA were good comments, and if you improved these areas, you should be able to receive many support in your next RFA.


 * The only problem you might have is your actual edit count. I think you have at least 500 machinery edits (AWB, VP, ARV), and the remainder after subtracting those numbers does not look very good. I'm not saying that you should not use these softwares, but you may need to increase your actual edits more.

Cheers! AQu01rius (User &#149; Talk) 04:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. -- Selmo  (talk) 01:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The only advice I have to offer at this point is to respond to other's messages left on your talk page, even if you do not know the answer or have no valuable information. I know that I left a comment on your page regarding VP about a month ago that was never responded to. I understand you most likely had not found a solution and my wording may have implied a response was not necessary (it wasn't), but nonetheless, it gives the impression of being ignored. As I am not a new user, this did not bother me, but it might upset newcomers. Just thought I would point that out. Hope the review goes well. Sincerely,  ßott  e   siηi  (talk) 01:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for that. It turned out to be a bug that was fixed in V 1.3. Will keep this in mind. -- Selmo  (talk) 04:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I saw a good comment you left on an anonymous IP talk page, and I thought you did a good job of giving them the benefit of the doubt in your comments. I just hammered him/her/it with a Template:Blatantvandal tag, but that's irrelevant to your good work. I think you'd make a good editor. All the best - Ezratrumpet 21:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions

My work to Vancouver, which is currently being reviewed at WP:FAC (with consensus leaning towards "support"). I'm active in fighting vandalism, and I have also did a lot of other work for WikiProject Vancouver. Not since my RfA. I've joined Esperanza as a method to relieve any stress, which hasn't been necessary yet.
 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Answer
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Answer
 * Answer