Wikipedia:Editor review/Shadowjams

Shadowjams
After becoming relatively involved in the project I'd like some feedback on my progress. I've moderated many of my earlier views through experience, and I think my editing has mellowed out somewhat. I'd like to see what additional areas I can work on. Shadowjams (talk) 09:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I do a lot of vandalism patrol, a lot of new page patrol (a lot of CSD initially, less now, but I think my CSDs now are a lot more accurate), and a fair amount of stub creation. I have a few pages I've created that I'm especially proud of, the most notable being Comparisons of State Governments
 * ''I also have a substantial number of WP:AWB edits, largely from filters I've created myself. The details are too numerous to explain here, but there are some examples on my user page, and I've also been a contributor to WP:AWB/T both in form and on the talk page.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * None that come to mind aside from one that I don't think was especially controversial. (New York Radical Feminists)
 * None that come to mind aside from one that I don't think was especially controversial. (New York Radical Feminists)

 Reviews  Buggie111 (talk) 20:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You seem to be doing fine wiuth your vandal revisions and AFD work. If you ever run for an WP:RFA, I'd suggest putting those in question 1. Some editors might complain at your abundancy of automated edits, which are large amount of your edits (theyr'e all good, just their automated). To get more content work, I'd suggest joining a WP:Wikiproject that you are interested in, where you can be helped out by other people like you who are working towords a common goal. Everything else seems fine, continue the wonderful work!