Wikipedia:Editor review/Shawnpoo

Shawnpoo

 * Archival note: Archived due to inactivity of user.-- T ru  c o   02:53, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

I've been actively reverting vandalism for the past week (I know thats nothing) and was looking for criticism on what I can do to help out wikipedia. Shawnpoo (talk) 19:47, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * Well Shawnpoo, I notice that you recently returned to Wikipedia. You've been doing fine since then. You revert a lot of disruption (which is great appreciated), however, in the future make sure your reverts are correct to avoid an error like the one you mentioned below. I insist that you actually edit articles (as in editing the content not just reverting edits), I also recommend editing other areas of Wikipedia (not just articles), such as WP:XFD or even here at WP:ER. In the future, if you get in an edit conflict, remain civil and seek help if needed, or just walk away from it if possible. Best, -- ₮ RU  C Ө   20:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. You're doing great with Huggle and Twinkle, but I would also recommend working in some more collaborative areas of Wikipedia, such as WP:XfD.  Keep it up!  -  down  load  |  sign!  20:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the compliments, I have been working hard in AfD now.  §hawn poo   17:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi. This AfD nomination shows that you need to read up on the notability criteria; as well as the general WP:BIO there are more detailed ones like WP:ATHLETE and (one I didn't know about before) WP:CRIN for cricketers. It's also useful to do a Google search before nominating (see WP:BEFORE): in this case that shows up enough references to confirm that he's real and probably does meet the WP:GNG. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes I agree that was a bad nomination on my part. I looked back at it and just said "Why did I nominate that?" must have misunderstood the article. I will make sure that that doesn't happen again.  §hawn poo   22:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It is good to see you go from being blocked for vandalism to being awarded for fighting vandalism. Turn arounds are always refreshing here.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 00:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Mostly just my vandalism reverting.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes I have, I had an edit conflict with an anon on Supercentenarians. It was a misunderstanding on my part as i believed it was vandalism and was handled on my talk page here.
 * Yes I have, I had an edit conflict with an anon on Supercentenarians. It was a misunderstanding on my part as i believed it was vandalism and was handled on my talk page here.