Wikipedia:Editor review/Simply south 3

Simply south

 * Archival note: Archived with consent of user (open past 30 day time limit)-- T ru  c o   23:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Its been about a year and a quarter since my last review and as usual i just want to see what people think. Where should i focus more on when i have the time? What have been the good and bad points? etc. I've now been on WP for nearly 3 years. I am still not wanting to be an admin. Simply south not SS, sorry 22:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 

based on 15 edits from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Major_UK_railway_stations&diff=prev&oldid=268739019 to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Digimon&diff=prev&oldid=268157319

Where should i focus more on when i have the time? the editor could focus less on talking on talkpages, and focus more on mainspace

What have been the good and bad points? bad - talking in excess good - friendly characterWhatisFeelings? (talk) 03:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I like that you have never been blocked and thought your argument in Articles for deletion/London Underground trivia (4th nomination) was reasonable. Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 20:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, just caught this - maybe it's time for one of my own. I don't think discussion on talk pages is a disadvantage. I guess what the editor is saying is be bold and move the discussion onto the next improvement. As to the admin question, my response is step up; it's a burden, but it's a necessary burden to improve the project. I hope at some time, you'll reconsider your position on becoming an admin. I seem to remember you urged much the same on me, a little over a year ago ... I'd be more than happy to nom, or co-nom you. Kbthompson (talk) 11:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I am pleased with much of my work with occaisional exceptions. My current focus has been to do alterations to Motto of the day and for the past half a year i have taken over the LT newsletter. I also still enjoy discussion and other things. Please no more Word Association comments, possibly.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Nobody i think has caused me stress properly. I have been in occaisional disputes, such as a recent one involving someone's opinion on the politics of Crossrail, a London railway project. I was not the only person involved in the dispute. There was a bit of discussion on POV pusing and whether or not Wikipedia is a forum. I have dealt with it by calmly in the background discussing with the editor on it although i am not sure how well that turned out. There was also a lot of prodding of people's pages. The main discussions were at Talk:Crossrail and User talk:Mr. Wheely Guy, although he was also trying to discuss with the IP. As per usual i will discuss with people what should happen and hopefully come to a solution.
 * Nobody i think has caused me stress properly. I have been in occaisional disputes, such as a recent one involving someone's opinion on the politics of Crossrail, a London railway project. I was not the only person involved in the dispute. There was a bit of discussion on POV pusing and whether or not Wikipedia is a forum. I have dealt with it by calmly in the background discussing with the editor on it although i am not sure how well that turned out. There was also a lot of prodding of people's pages. The main discussions were at Talk:Crossrail and User talk:Mr. Wheely Guy, although he was also trying to discuss with the IP. As per usual i will discuss with people what should happen and hopefully come to a solution.