Wikipedia:Editor review/Skitzouk

Skitzouk
I as i'm thinking of eventually applying to be an admin or a similar type role on here Skitzo (talk) 23:06, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 

replying to "want to check that my edits are constructive and not too POV oriented"

review based on last 20 edits from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football&diff=prev&oldid=268740934 to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Leicester_City_F.C.&diff=prev&oldid=268374650 & http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_Holton&diff=prev&oldid=268334214 to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Leicester_City_F.C._squad&diff=prev&oldid=268064103

conclusion: constructive - yes npov - cannot be determined based on the edits looked atWhatisFeelings? (talk) 03:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
 * So far you meet User:A_Nobody in that you have never been blocked and that we have had no memorable negative interactions. A suggestion as to how to further increase your chances of becoming an admin would be to help rescue articles as voters at RfA like to see GA and FA credits with candidates.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 20:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * not specifically but I do take a special interest in the Joe Mattock article as I 1st created it and so I try to make it as good as I know how.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * only a few minor edit conflicts when no source was present which were quickly sorted whe an appropriate source could be added to support the information.
 * only a few minor edit conflicts when no source was present which were quickly sorted whe an appropriate source could be added to support the information.