Wikipedia:Editor review/Sm8900 (2)

Sm8900
Interested to get feedback from fellow editors. have done work on a number of topics recently. interested to hear some thoughts, comments, feedback. Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?Here are some: Performance art -made major contribution to definition. Valley of Peace initiative keep article current and updated. Robot; wrote this section, added much data and refs. History of Israeli-Palestinian conflict. --revised article a lot in the past. (not so much recently). also: Projects working for peace among Arabs and Israelis, History of England, US Army Service Uniform. Generally I do edits on a number of articles, much of them in history, politics, etc. also do some pop culture. also have done a bunch of new categories in the past. 
 * 2) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * not much. a few years ago, was involved in dispute resolution at israeli-Palestinian topic area, in helping to resolve disputes. this was even though i am an involved editor.Also, around the same time, jan 2008, involved in editing dispute in climate change article. 
 * not much. a few years ago, was involved in dispute resolution at israeli-Palestinian topic area, in helping to resolve disputes. this was even though i am an involved editor.Also, around the same time, jan 2008, involved in editing dispute in climate change article. 

 Reviews 
 * Review by VictorianMutant:
 * Civility towards the community: Wow, no one could ever accuse you of steering clear of contentious articles. Israeli–Palestinian conflict, Ten Lost Tribes, and Global warming. And you've managed to keep a blemish-free block record. You are definitely a better person than most...
 * Article contributions: You are definitely here to contribute to articles. A quick glance of some of your edits tells me you are a good writer. So the one glaring area missing to me from your edit history is GA's and FAC's. I think it would be fairly easy to get a few of the articles you've worked on up to good article status, and even featured article status.
 * Edit count analysis: Your graph impresses me. Looking further into your contributions tells me you're very active in discussions, both in Wikipedia space and on article talk space. Keep up the good work.
 * RfA-worthiness: I would definitely support... don't know how many enemies have been made on some of the controversial articles, though.
 * Final thoughts: You are a great asset to the Wikipedia community. Like I said, I think you could get a few of your articles to be GA's really easily and if I were you and had your talents, I would... Thanks for all you do, Victorian Mutant (talk) 02:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for your great comments!! and thanks for your helpful ideas and thoughts. appreciate it. feel free to be in touch anytime. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC)