Wikipedia:Editor review/Smallman12q

Smallman12q
I would like to know what the general community thinks of me. Smallman12q (talk) 00:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I had a quick overview of your activity on wikipedia. First of all, you have a pretty impressive work rate, well done! You seem to have good interaction with other editors and work well with people. Your talk page shows you are view in a positive light and you actively help and encourage newbies. I liked how you handled potential dispute at chemtrails where rather than taking critiscism personally and acting defensivelu, you worked through the points. Keep up the good work G  ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 21:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions is my work at DYK and the hundred articles I created. Generally, I have been contributing in various parts of wikipedia (exploring in a way), but I am becoming more focused on article development and contributions in encyclopedia area iteslf. I also have about 5000 edits in six months, so I am fairly active by wikipedia standards.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * My only editing dispute so far has been with chemtrails. I responded by creating a relevant discussion thread on the talk page and sought to see why it was that I was in the "wrong." I believe that disputes can be solved with a simple discussion and with a bit of common sense.
 * My only editing dispute so far has been with chemtrails. I responded by creating a relevant discussion thread on the talk page and sought to see why it was that I was in the "wrong." I believe that disputes can be solved with a simple discussion and with a bit of common sense.