Wikipedia:Editor review/Soetermans

Soetermans
Hiya! By accident I found this little shindig (thanks Johnnywalterboy), so I thought I'd just join the fun. I've been an active editor for over 2 years now and I think it will be nice to get to know what other Wikipedians think of me. Thanks! Soetermans |  is listening  |  what he'd do now?  01:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * I've noticed that on several articles you edit (see, for example, De Jeugd van Tegenwoordig), you fail to provide an edit summary with you edits. Please provide one so other editors can easily see what you've done and understand the rationale for the edit, if one is needed. Other than that, keep up the good work! --Eustress (talk) 23:47, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Yeah, it's the little things, like typos, Capital Letters Which Are Completely Unnecessary, correcting links or compressing lists in articles (soundtracks etc). I've created a couple of article too, that was pretty cool.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I only have been in two conflicts. One was quickly resolved, it was about the Body Harvest article, other users backed me up there. The other one was about The Pirates of Dark Water article. That one was a nuisance - another user completely disagreed with me. It didn't stress me out though, disagreeing over one of the two and a half million articles on Wikipedia seems a bit silly. I left the whole lot of it, I'm pretty sure somebody will make the same conclusions as I did.
 * I only have been in two conflicts. One was quickly resolved, it was about the Body Harvest article, other users backed me up there. The other one was about The Pirates of Dark Water article. That one was a nuisance - another user completely disagreed with me. It didn't stress me out though, disagreeing over one of the two and a half million articles on Wikipedia seems a bit silly. I left the whole lot of it, I'm pretty sure somebody will make the same conclusions as I did.