Wikipedia:Editor review/Soxrock24

Soxrock24
I've been on Wikipedia for two years and have pretty active for 1. I have under 500 edits and am looking on suggestions for what I can do better and any potential criticism. SOXROX (talk) 21:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I primarily contribute to political and sports articles, as these interest me the most, and I have the most knowledge in these fields. The only four articles I created were stubs about athletes- 3 about rookies in the NFL, and another about a basketball player entered in the NBA draft this year. Politically, I've been involved greatly in the 2012 presidential election article. I'm a member of the United States presidential election, NBA, and NFL wikiprojects. I am also a reviewer (as of april, not anymore now that it is gone), and had my rollback request declined rcently.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I'm actually in the middle of one right now at Talk:United States presidential election, 2012. Me and another editor have been pushing to remove certain minor candidates from the republican section, and another editor refuses to compromise. The editor that I agree with won't compromise either. We finally got a straw poll up the other day but I don't think that will resolve it because the request for comment hasn't made a consensus.
 * I'm actually in the middle of one right now at Talk:United States presidential election, 2012. Me and another editor have been pushing to remove certain minor candidates from the republican section, and another editor refuses to compromise. The editor that I agree with won't compromise either. We finally got a straw poll up the other day but I don't think that will resolve it because the request for comment hasn't made a consensus.

 Reviews 
 * I do not have the time to write you a full review, however I did go over your work at AFD. Its good that you are working there, AfD always need more hands on deck, however (this goes for pretty much everyone) I think a review of Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions would be good. You make some solid votes, but then other times just listing policies is not as good as an argument as to why a specific policy is not met. jorgenev 15:28, 20 June 2011 (UTC)