Wikipedia:Editor review/Spinach Monster

Spinach Monster
I'm just looking to see how i'm doing in the eyes of the community Spinach Monster (talk) 13:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hey SM, you've been doing a great job lately with Obama articles (Yes We Can). I just recommend that you edit other areas of WP, not just articles, but areas of WP, like WP:XFD, WP:AIV, or even here at WP:ER. I see that you rarely get into disputes, keep that up, and will be one great editor here on WP.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   00:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 

 Questions
 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter
 * To save you all some time, I started in late January and I have around 2,000 edits. Approximately 65% articles, 35% project space. However, I readily admit that my edit rates are erratic due to my real life. I'd assume by June I'd have around 6,000 edits or so, if that really matters to anyone. Spinach Monster (talk) 13:38, 21 March 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * So far my main work has been on Confirmations of Barack Obama's Cabinet, to which I have nearly 300 edits, I'd really like to see it get up to featured status. However, I'm also proud of the live editing during Super Bowl XLIII]. Spinach Monster (talk) 13:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * The biggest conflict i've had was during a discussion on WP:Requests for adminship/Admiral Norton. I questioned the vote! of Ottava Rima since it seemed based not on the admin candidate, but on their own views of the encyclopedia as a whole, which I thought was unfair to the candidate. I stated this, some people thought my comment was unfair to Ottava Rima, and I stated that Ottava has the right to his opinion, and that I respected that, but I could not agree with it at the time.
 * The biggest conflict i've had was during a discussion on WP:Requests for adminship/Admiral Norton. I questioned the vote! of Ottava Rima since it seemed based not on the admin candidate, but on their own views of the encyclopedia as a whole, which I thought was unfair to the candidate. I stated this, some people thought my comment was unfair to Ottava Rima, and I stated that Ottava has the right to his opinion, and that I respected that, but I could not agree with it at the time.

Since then i've come to see that my opinion was wrong and Ottava's opinions are much more candidate based than it seemed to me at the time. Spinach Monster (talk) 13:34, 21 March 2009 (UTC)