Wikipedia:Editor review/Squirepants101

Squirepants101
I have edited Wikipedia since February 2006 and since that time, I have more than 6000 edits, but I'd like to know how I can improve the quality of my contributions. I am not planning on becoming an administrator. Squirepants101 04:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I tried a more extensive reading phase than Mathmo (see below), but my conclusions are much the same. I wish you good luck. YechielMan 02:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Excellent anti-vandalism work. Keep it up!
 * 2) Good, civil and reasonable discussions on talk pages. You've handled disputes admirably.  I'm very impressed about how you nailed Danny Daniel with Checkuser.
 * 3) You seem to have somewhat of a narrow focus on article writing. It's fun to write about your favorite TV shows, but once you've done a lot of that, you need to find some new goal to set for yourself.  I can't tell you what that should be, but think about it.  By this time next year, maybe you will have a contribution that you are truly pleased with.

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm not sure what contributions I'm pleased with.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * In September 2006, I was involved in an edit war at List of characters in Camp Lazlo, which resulted in page protection. I've also had an IP ask me my "motive" for bringing back fancruft at List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy. I responded at the IP address's talk page.
 * In September 2006, I was involved in an edit war at List of characters in Camp Lazlo, which resulted in page protection. I've also had an IP ask me my "motive" for bringing back fancruft at List of characters in Ed, Edd n Eddy. I responded at the IP address's talk page.


 * Comments, looked at your edit counts. Looks nice there at first glance, perhaps Wikipedia talk is a bit small for the number of edits you have made. Secondly perhaps it might be good to spend more time thinking about what contributions you are pleased about, it is good for your motivation to have a know about what you are really happy about here. Perhaps if you focused on lifting an article up to FA status? Mathmo Talk 23:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)