Wikipedia:Editor review/Steve Crossin 2

Steve Crossin
It's been a while since my last editor review, and I think it's time for a new one. I know feedback will be both positive and negative, but it's best that I hear it. I'd like to know how my edits are, and where I could improve on as an editor. I welcome criticism, actually, I'm asking for it. Point out where I can improve, be honest. Note I don't intend to run for RFA any time soon. Steve Crossin  (talk)   (contact page)  22:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * You have a great editcount and summary usage, and a great distribution of edits throughout the project. You have fair communication skills, though they are good enough.  You do well in the Wikipedia space, and you have a massive number of edits.  From what you said on IRC, you heavily used huggle (I do to, and personally I love it ;-)) but some editors dislike the use of automated tools.  I am impressed by all the image uploading and sorting you do.  I also feel you have a great grasp on policy.  Overall I'd say you are doing really well!  Yamakiri  TC     [ §]    07-30-2008 • 05:26:13
 * You might find Requests for adminship of use ;) - Icewedge (talk) 06:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * *Is completely fed up with you sending me images to delete* :P No but seriously, you've done an amazing amount of cleanup work for WP:24. Stuff like trimming down unneeded templates, deleting unwanted and unfree images (through me -.-) and taking the time to trim unwieldy plot sections. It's popular for pages about popular entertainment to be flooded with plot sections, and not many people can be bothered to trim them down, so it's good that you've taken that initiative. Meanwhile, I've seen good and solid arguments at AfD, and none of the WP:PERNOM comments except when necessary. Although it's important to keep in mind not to "pernom" or "perX" blitz AfDs, don't be afraid to do so if the nomination, or another comment, hits the nail on the head. Furthermore, the Prem Rawat mediation case is quite astonishing, and you've put a lot of effort and dedication into a very controversial topic. I've seen no big errors of judgement in the edits I've looked at, and your civility and maturity is sound, so there are no big problems here. :) PeterSymonds (talk)  11:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * *Is even more fed up with the constant feed of images to be deleted, and pages to be protected/deleted, on your request* :P I, like everyone so far, believe you're a great editor. You are very good at handling disputes, and you seem to know policy thoroughly. You go way past my criteria for adminship, and all that in only the 6 months you've been here. I would say more, but I'll save it for your RFA. ;) -- Chet B. Long Talk / ARK 21:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Per nom...oh wait...this isn't RfA. Darn. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Support; I would gladly support this editor at an RfA. Excellent contributions. Unschool (talk) 21:35, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 
 * Well that was depressing... Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My triple crown for my work on Ziegler Polar Expedition, Martha Logan and Image:RedCrossNursen.jpg, my general work involving the 24 project and related articles, and how I've handled the Prem Rawat case so far, would be what I'm most happy about.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I've had some recent personal issues that got intermixed with Wikipedia, which I really don't care to elaborate on, needless to say it's a serious matter that has been dealt with, and I'm doing more to keep my on and off wiki life separate. Quite some time ago, I had a conflict with an editor over a 24 related issue, which resolved itself, as mentioned in my previous issue. Apart from minor editorial issues, I've had relatively little conflict, though being a mediator, I get involved in conflict somewhat.
 * I've had some recent personal issues that got intermixed with Wikipedia, which I really don't care to elaborate on, needless to say it's a serious matter that has been dealt with, and I'm doing more to keep my on and off wiki life separate. Quite some time ago, I had a conflict with an editor over a 24 related issue, which resolved itself, as mentioned in my previous issue. Apart from minor editorial issues, I've had relatively little conflict, though being a mediator, I get involved in conflict somewhat.