Wikipedia:Editor review/Stormtracker94 2

Stormtracker94
Hey all. I've been editing around here for about four months and have decided to check my progress yet again. Mainly, I would like to know how my editing is, and when I should apply for adminship. Thanks-  STORMTRACKER  94  19:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * A quick review, for the adminship hopeful. I would suggest some more edits in the admin related area's, and youy should get a few more edits in the main, probably some vandal reversions. Other than that, I would say don't self-nom for adminship, get an experienced editor/admin to do it for you. I suggest that you do it when you get to about 4.5 to 5 thousand total edits, otherwise they will scream "to little editing or not enough mainspace". &lt; DREAMAFTER &gt; &lt; TALK &gt; 23:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool


 * Previous editor review at Editor review/Stormtracker94

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Mainly, my best contirbutions on Wikipedia are editing and expanding baseball articles, such as Luis Castillo (baseball) and Juan Uribe, as well as vandalism fighting and newpage/RC patrol. I currently have an edit count of about 3,500 and my edit summary usage is 100%.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, mainly with vandalism work. I have reported vandals who were angry at me after revertion to the AIV if they were repeat vandals, which they all were. If they were not, I would report it to an admin right away.
 * Yes, mainly with vandalism work. I have reported vandals who were angry at me after revertion to the AIV if they were repeat vandals, which they all were. If they were not, I would report it to an admin right away.