Wikipedia:Editor review/SupernovaExplosion

SupernovaExplosion
Hello. I have been in Wikipedia for more than one month and I have made more than 3000 contributions to Wikipedia. Please review my contributions.  Supernova Explosion   Talk  04:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Content building My best contributions till this date, when I am requesting the review, are the 12 DYKs which I've written and significantly expanded. I have significantly expanded and improved the article A Free Ride and has nominated it for GA review. Apart from these, I've contributed to many other articles, and created new articles. Anti-vandalism I have been using Huggle, warned many users for violating policies, and reported many users to WP:AIV for vandalism after final warning. New page patrol I have patrolled new pages and proposed many newly created articles for speedy deletions based on WP:SPEEDY. Reference Desk I find pleasure helping people seeking information. I regularly monitor the reference desks and replied to a lot of questions. AfD I've voted in many AfDs and nominated articles for AfD which I believe do not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. My AfD stat is here.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Till now, I've not encountered any severe dispute over content issue. In future, if other editors disagree with me over any content issue, I will discuss the matter with them in the talk page of the article, and will try to achive a consensus. I dislike edit warring, and belive edit warring without discussion is disruptive. In severe disputes, if I encounter in future, I will go through Dispute resolution.
 * Till now, I've not encountered any severe dispute over content issue. In future, if other editors disagree with me over any content issue, I will discuss the matter with them in the talk page of the article, and will try to achive a consensus. I dislike edit warring, and belive edit warring without discussion is disruptive. In severe disputes, if I encounter in future, I will go through Dispute resolution.

 Reviews by  Yash  t  101  :) 


 * I have seen them around for a long time now, and really have to say that they are an amazing editor. Best thing about them is that they take part actively in editing articles along with that, they also have good knowledge of policies. Comparatively Less edit counts and so much grip of wiki is a rare quality that I find in them. Overall, a perfect editor who can make up a superb admin if they stay with the same tempo for 3-5 months.  Yash t  101  :)  08:19, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review. It will take a long time to be eligible for adminship, there are a lot of areas I need to be well-versed with. But one thing I can say, I learn everyday, and try hard to avoid repeating mistakes if I did any. -- Supernova Explosion   Talk  09:00, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

I will like to get some more reviews. Thanks! -- Supernova Explosion   Talk  13:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)