Wikipedia:Editor review/Surajt88

Surajt88
I have been in Wikipedia for more than a year. I would like to know how I have progressed and I would very much appreciate any feedback. Thanks in advance. Suraj T  06:01, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions to wikipedia include creating articles related to photovoltaics and sometimes related to tourist spots in and around Ooty. I also do a bit of vandalism fighting occasionally by patrolling recent changes. I am particularly pleased with my contributions to Category:Photovoltaics and organizing them into Template:Photovoltaics, because of the effort I put in. I'm also proud of the work I put in Pale Blue Dot to have it listed as a good article and my DYKs and ITN listed here
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * All I can remember is here, which reflected here and here, but I'd rather call it misunderstanding than a dispute. And I believe I was pretty cool throughout. I wouldn't be unnecessarily losing my cool if I get into a dispute with another editor provided it doesn't get personal. I understand that both sides of most disputes which are approached civilly support improving wikipedia content but with different views and it would be unnecessary to heat up.
 * All I can remember is here, which reflected here and here, but I'd rather call it misunderstanding than a dispute. And I believe I was pretty cool throughout. I wouldn't be unnecessarily losing my cool if I get into a dispute with another editor provided it doesn't get personal. I understand that both sides of most disputes which are approached civilly support improving wikipedia content but with different views and it would be unnecessary to heat up.

 Reviews 
 * You are doing quite fine so far, which may explain the lack of feedback. If you intend to run for RfA, the community might expect more activity from you. - Mailer Diablo 22:19, 31 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. I'm not interested in adminship as I dont need the tools. I'm currently enjoying editing as I am doing now.  Suraj  T  16:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The matter of Ooty which made it on the Dispute Resolution board was handled well by you. You seem to have also close ties with Ooty with being a main contributor to the article and Commercial road, Ooty which should be disclosed in future disputes if true.  Though I can say sometimes you need to watch your language and tone.  And edit summary of "oh..plz..get consensus before throwin ur shit around.." could come back to bite you. Your false positives with vandalism may be well in the past, but still some mistakes do occur and you typically fix them quickly. Such as tagging for speedy deletion and correcting the matter as need  be with Rashtriya Viddyalaya Sangathan. Another instance with the Admin noticeboard.  Aside from that, your edits are fine and incremental. ChrisGualtieri(talk) 17:33, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't believe I missed the comment made above. Though belated, I would like to thank you for your constructive review. Suraj  T  17:23, 29 June 2012 (UTC)