Wikipedia:Editor review/SwisterTwister

SwisterTwister
Hello, I'm David also known as SwisterTwister and I'm curious what other users think of my contributions. SwisterTwister  talk  06:36, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Well, I don't concentrate on specifically one contribution as I think many of them have been helpful, but I suppose I would say vandalism reverting
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * No editing wars yet, fortunately. The way I deal with users pressuring me about my edits or anything like that is I simply let it go and concentrate on the better things. Well, I think if I were in an edit war I would either give them my point of view why or simply ignore them. I believe it would depend on the situation, but on a good day I would prefer the second option (letting it go and focusing on better things).
 * No editing wars yet, fortunately. The way I deal with users pressuring me about my edits or anything like that is I simply let it go and concentrate on the better things. Well, I think if I were in an edit war I would either give them my point of view why or simply ignore them. I believe it would depend on the situation, but on a good day I would prefer the second option (letting it go and focusing on better things).

 Reviews by Sp33dyphil
 * Civility towards the community: I'm happy with the way you welcome new users by posting TW messages on their page. Your reponse to a question at, this reminder, and the handing out of cookies gives an impression that you can be tough and easy-to-approach at the same time.
 * Article contributions: I think you're the opposite of the old me -- you don't do a lot of content creation, as the article that you have worked on the most 2011 in radio, have been edited only 44 times by you. I'll be frank -- I think the main purpose of Wikipedia is to build an encyclopedia, so I think it will benefit the site more if you do less vandalism fighting, and more content creation. I suggest devoting 40% of your time on CC, 30% on vandal-fighting, and 25% for others. I do think that any rollback of vandalism is content-creation in a sense like, for every dollar you save, you earn a dollar. I'd just like to see you get an article to GA one day, which isn't hard at all.
 * Edit count analysis: I think you're not participating in dialogue in Wikipedia talk space too much; besides that, I have no other comments.
 * RfA-worthiness: I see that you've immersed yourself in AfDs and vandal-fighting, which are key criteria if you want to bring on the responsibilities of adminship. In particular, your percentage of correct stances in AfDs (91.8%) at tells me that you are very well-versed with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Thus, I wouldn't mind supporting you if you decide to RfA in the future.
 * Final thoughts: I think you are doing great work and displaying an understanding of Wikipedia's policies by participating in AfDs, vandal-fighting, etc. I'd love to see you write a GA article, though. Sp33dyphil © • © 02:11, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Where should go the other 5%?   Ebe 123   (+) $talk Contribs$ 21:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Procrastination? JK, I think it should be others, raising the percentage to 30% Hmm, my maths wasn't up to scratches. --Sp33dyphil © • © 22:01, 28 October 2011 (UTC)