Wikipedia:Editor review/Tempest115

Tempest115
Well I've been editing Wikipedia for a few months now and I wanted to know how I've been doing. Tempest115 00:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Almost a year's editing, not a few months! 1.2K edits in this time is quite good. Looking at your edit summary usage, BRILLIANT for minor edits (95%), but not so good for the major edits (66%). I believe that it is more important to document your major edits with an edit summary. Also, the edit summaries you leave are not very helpful, such as your edit to Dusknoir, the edit summary was Therefore it should stay as it was. To me, I don't know what you did. Try using edit summaries which are more informative, eg undid change by 68.81.252.24: because 'may have been written about' does not explain change to "be based on" only "have ties". This will ensure that the person reading the page history, or your contribs (like me) will understand what you did. Remember, you can have upto 200 characters in the edit summary, after which it is cut off, but you can preview it by clicking the Show Preview button, and below the edit summary box, it should say Preview of edit summary. I hope this helps, cos you are a great editor, just improve on the edit summary. :) Stwalkerster  talk review 21:30, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * You recently saw an edit of mine, and reverted it demanding "Discuss it, don't just get rid of it". This revert included wikilinks and reverting some subtle edits of mine.  You did not take the time to examine the edit. Often, I think non-controversial edits like the one I make can be done without that much discussion, as I was removing things like "Jabberwocky in the simpsons" or "Jabberwocky in non-notable video-games".  A careful review and edit of my edit may have contributed to things, but instead you come off looking like you can't be bothered to look closely at an edit. You should be more polite and careful in your edits. leontes 03:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * The edits I'm most proud of are my clean-ups of neglected pages. I'm also proud of most of my minor edits, since those too have been neglected.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * The first time I had an edit conflict, I explained my reasons while editing. Since then, I've responded on to my, for lack of a better word, opponents talk page, explaining my reasoning.  Often times, we come to an agreeable consensus.
 * The first time I had an edit conflict, I explained my reasons while editing. Since then, I've responded on to my, for lack of a better word, opponents talk page, explaining my reasoning.  Often times, we come to an agreeable consensus.