Wikipedia:Editor review/TheClerksWell

TheClerksWell
I am curious about what Feedback I'll get Clerkenwell ''TALK PAGE!" Contribs 22:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Correcting Typos, spelling and grammar errors, occasionally fixing links from disambaguation pages to the intended page, creating articles sporadically.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes, yes, I have dealt with it by arguing, which didn't work and got be blocked before, in the future I will use discussion.
 * Yes, yes, I have dealt with it by arguing, which didn't work and got be blocked before, in the future I will use discussion.

 Reviews 


 * I can't say I've seen your username before, so nice to meet you! A quick look at your talk page shows that you are receiving plenty of feedback and suggestions already; please use that to help yourself become a better editor. I also stumbled upon Administrator review/TheClerksWell, which you created by accident and then asked that it be deleted. I have tagged it accordingly under speedy deletion criterion G7; you can request deletion of something you created and want deleted yourself next time by using . All speedy deletion templates add the page to CAT:CSD, where an administrator will review it and decide the page's fate (delete or keep). Your last 100 contributions show that you hardly ever use an edit summary. I would advise using them all of the time, as they explain your edits and help avoid confusion over what you have done. Other than that, keep it up; you're on the right track. Airplaneman   ✈  03:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)