Wikipedia:Editor review/Tim Song (2)

Tim Song
I also have an alternate account with the unimaginative name of and another. Listing myself here to get some feedback on my work. Tim Song (talk) 18:34, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Most of my work these days is at AfD, where I do most of the relists and perform non-admin closures, and at deletion review, where I frequently participate. I'm also a participant in the Articles for creation process, and wrote a script for AFC. In addition, I also Huggle sometimes.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to ) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Nothing recently. I guess my skin has grown thick . I still sometimes disagree with people, obviously, but to the best of my knowledge it has not been personal.
 * Nothing recently. I guess my skin has grown thick . I still sometimes disagree with people, obviously, but to the best of my knowledge it has not been personal.

 Reviews 


 * Everything I've seen from you has been good, between your AfD work, DRV comments, and general gnome-ish edits. I just learned a couple days ago that you're not an administrator, which I think ought to be rectified. :) Keep it up! – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * As JC said, very good work overall and I certainly agree that you should become an admin in the near future. Also, good work at AFC!  fetch  comms  ☛ 16:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreeing with Julian as well. If you want to try adminship and want some help, feel free to contact me Regards  So  Why  12:29, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I've seen your edits a lot at AFD, and I think they are quite helpful. (Sorry to bring up potentially bad memories, but...) I appreciate the sensible, low-drama approach to conflict you took at your last editor review – disengaging from the situation and seeking the advice of other members of the community.  Echoing the above comments, I think you should go for admin.  Keep up the good work! —  æk Talk  07:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have consistently seen you at AfD. I only have one issue with this you: the fact that you have not yet been nominated for adminship. You should get that fixed (NB: on that note, I am more than willing to nominate you). --Shirik (talk) 19:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks guys. BTW, Julian, I'm kind of surprised that you do not know about my mopless status given this Tim Song (talk) 12:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there an echo in the room? You should be an admin Tim but I'm concerned that the zealots at RFA won't promote you for not having enough article writing experience. I'd say its time to run as long as you promise not to leave in disgust if the crowd at RFA screw up and vote you down. Another co-nom here when you want it. :-) Spartaz Humbug! 11:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why, but I see you closing a lot of AfDs I've taken an interest in. Some people might think that this is an indication of ambition to be an admin. I only see three articles created by you, Dan Gerber and Alabama Department of Public Health, two of which you seem to have recreated following a copyvio problem, and one from AfC, Liu Yong (Qing Dynasty). Do you have another account you use/used for article creation? Abductive  (reasoning) 05:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No. To be frank, I'm not a good writer. Also, Liu Yong (Qing Dynasty) went through AfC because I was writing a script for AfC at that time and needed something to test it on. Timotheus Canens (talk) 05:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)